MAY 30    In-house critic
The History Of York
Oxford Dictionary Of Biography Map Of Local Heroes
Newseum
Royal Opera House Collections Online
Exploring Surrey's Past
Coalfields Heritage Initiative Kent

Museum of the History of Science's Small Worlds
Letter In The Attic
Best Laid Schemes
 

MAY 28   The Metropolitan Museum of Art


 

MAY 27   The Victorian literature challenge

Here is a list of authors I have set aside to read until the end of December.

Jane Austen
Walter Scott
Charles Dickens
Lewis Carroll
Rudyard Kipling
Robert Louis Stevenson
Bram Stoker
William Thackeray
Victor Hugo
Oscar Wilde
Brontë Sisters
George Elliot (Mary Ann Evans)
 

MAY 26   The wild man of Oxford

Wild men are often found in myths, legends and folklore. Some live in snowy or mountain areas, such as the Yeti in the Himalayas, Bigfoot in North America and the Sasquatch in Canada. Other wild men live in the forests, such as the Russian Leshiy, Silenus of Greek mythology and Grendel in the Anglo-Saxon epic, Beowulf.

In many old myths, wild men are violent and frightening. They steal away children and attack humans. However, in other tales, from the late 15th century onwards, the wild men are often gentle beings who look after nature. The wild man of Orford was not violent, just strange and different to the people that captured him. The wild man of Orford is like many other characters of folklore. He stayed away from people, was big and heavy and very hairy. He had a human face but could only make grunts or cries. Where the wild man of Orford is different, is that he came from the sea and was caught in a fisherman's net. This is why he is sometimes called a Merman.
 

A Merman is usually a character who is human from the waist up but has a fish's tale, such as Triton in the Greek legends. The Triton had a green beard and hair and played music using a seashell. Another merman, of Norwegian legend, was a monster of huge size that would rise up out of the water. These mermen lived in the sea and were able to sink ships by calling up great storms.

The Wild Man of Orford is sometimes shown in pictures with a fishes tail. Although there is nothing about him having any thing fish like, in the first writings about the event, later ones sometimes talk about webbed hands or feet.

Ralph of Coggeshall wrote down the tale of the Wild Man of Orford, in the Chronicon Anglicanum in 1200, some years after the events. The Cistercian monks at Coggeshall Abbey in Essex kept the document. At this time, Bartholomew de Granville, as in the story, was in charge of Orford castle.  It is likely that a strange man was captured and taken to the castle dungeon and tortured, and he later escaped. However, who or what he really was, is still a mystery.  About the time of the story, people could not decide if this Wild Man was a merman, man, or even an evil spirit that lived in the body of a dead sailor.

Some people think that, because there are many wild men in folklore, it means that they must once have lived and were the last few of an ancient human species. Others believe that wild men may still live in remote areas of the earth today. 
People still claim to see Wild Men. There was a report of someone seeing a wild man in Winstead, Connecticut, in the 1970s. He was described as naked, about six feet tall and covered with dark hair.

Over the years, investigators have studied areas where wild men have been seen. They have made 'casts' (moulds) of footprints, and thought up ways to capture the creatures. However, no final evidence that there are really wild men has been found. Others believe that people who think they saw a wild man were wrong; that, because they came from towns and cities, they did not understand what they were seeing when they were in a more natural, wild environment.
 

MAY 24   Moustache Royale

Recently I developed an interest in moustaches. Nothing could be so ugly and so gallant at the  same time.  A ancient sign of virility, the well-groomed moustache is something that I envy to some extent.

Everything started a few days ago, reading about George V of Britain who, as a matter of fact, had a fine moustache and beard combination. The interest has escalated into a search for the most perfect moustache in history. Through my task it became clear that moustaches are ugly or unsuitable for some people, and I am yet to figure out if it's related to facial symmetry, colour or style.

Most royalty had a nice moustache (generally called Imperial or Royale) and expensive care was required to maintain it.  It normally had whiskers growing from both the upper lip and cheeks, curled upward, as sign of sophistication. Even if Salvador Dali left his mark with his  narrow, long points bent or curved steeply upward, of which areas past the corner of the mouth needed to be shaved to allow artificial styling aids, most painters preferred a beard instead, probably due to a lack of time or patience.

The Traditional English moustache immortalised the stereotype of a nation (narrow, beginning at the middle of the upper lip the whiskers are very long and pulled to the side, slightly curled; the ends are pointed slightly upward; areas past the corner of the mouth must be shaved.


Artificial styling aids permitted) while the Walrus style (bushy, hanging down over the lips, often entirely covering the mouth) made sure that women stayed far away from it's owner.
 
A good moustache requires a dosage of vanity that I don't have and patience that I would prefer to spend elsewhere.  While admiring the very few men who possess a proper moustache these days, I still prefer my attempt to maintain my beard.
 

MAY 23   C. R. Cockerell

Although he built comparatively little, and only one of his buildings - the Ashmolean Museum and Taylorian Institute in Oxford - remains in the public eye, Cockerell is described in Howard Colvin's A Biographical Dictionary of British Architects (3rd ed., 1995) as 'at once the most fastidious and the least pedantic of English neo-classical architects', and by a leading architectural historian of the period as quite simply 'the greatest English neo-classical architect of the 19th century' (Frank Salmon, Building on Ruins, Aldershot 2000).

Before he was 25 or had designed a single building, Cockerell was famous throughout Europe for his part in discovering in quick succession two of the most important and complete groups of ancient Greek sculpture ever found - the famous Ægina Marbles from the east pediment of the Temple of Aphaia on the Island of Ægina (these are now in the Glyptotek, Munich) and the so-called Phigaleian Marbles from the interior of the Temple of Apollo Epikourios at Bassae (or Bassai) in Arcadia, which were purchased for the British Museum in 1814.

Feted in Florence and lionised in Rome for his intuitive knowledge and insight into the architecture and sculpture of the classical world, Cockerell almost abandoned the idea of becoming a practising architect to follow instead his true gifts as a 'professor of the beautiful in architecture'. Although his father, the architect S.P. Cockerell (1753-1827), persuaded him of the romantic folly of such a idea, he never lost the desire to communicate the wonder and excitement with which he had studied the surviving monuments of Greek and Roman antiquity during his early years abroad.
 


The Professor's Dream - C.R. Cockerell - Watercolour, 1848
 

MAY 22   Essay on overwhelming apologies - myself

I. It is the Human condition to withdraw from their surroundings sometimes, as I should do on a daily basis to recharge and equilibrate my thoughts.  It is essential.

II. It is due to past experience that I no longer confront foolish statements.  Foolish people say foolish things and defend their ignorance behind the shield of blind desire.  I don't confront the empty anymore.

III. It is natural that lost paths are filled with opinions by all minds. I will always guide myself through my own observations and learn from others the location of cliffs and rocks.  I will not perform against my will.

IV. It is a must to admire people's best qualities and wish to learn the same skills.  I will value others'  intentions to show me the pure and I shall learn from them.

V. Apologies will be made when a mistake is made. No shame, no sadness...  Responsibility, always.

VI. If my weakness is what I require to become stronger, then I shall be weak when it is morning and strong when it is night...  Never looking behind.

VII. Through selfish actions I am to move apart from the righteous idea that men have never achieved.  I add a
contribution in the right direction and will not shame my ancestors.

VIII. My choices are the extension of my goals and my feelings, an expansion of my Being.  I am to choose the right people to be part of the right me.

IX. If I am to dream, I will do so to reinforce my reality and to deal with my problems. Reality is best when we are part of it.

X. I will worship peace... Of mind, soul and body.  I will strike quickly and furiously whatever disturbs my balance. Force is balance.
 

MAY 21   Thoughts in a straitjacket
Seeing economist Creg Clydesdale from Massey University crucified for the results of his study results, which highlight the contribution of Pacific communities to New Zealand society, is disturbing.

The study is not based on his personal opinion, rather on pure data and statistics of which there is no trace of racism (and why should there be?) as claimed by some ignorant members of community and religious groups. It is research based on simple data gathered from official sources and not a total account and generalisation of the whole Pacific community.  

Insulting this scholar and his research will not change the results and rational approach is required. The economic liabilities of some parts of the Pacific community are a well-known 'unspoken' truth in our social dilemma, and so is our attitude on ignoring issues of this nature and talking about rugby instead.  Most of New Zealanders will avoid talking about anything that could offend anyone, with the exception of the Ministerial cabinet of the present government, since blaming the government is pointing fingers at no one specific. 

Since the release of the studies a few days ago, there has been a great deal of Polynesians manifesting a similar view to Clydesdale and blaming the lack of Polynesian integration with the host culture.  Some Polynesian citizens went further by
pointing out as cause for this data, family upbringing in New Zealand and the traditional Polynesian Churches.  Regardless of the results or guilty parties, this study can be used as a central point for social development and governmental programmes in order to bring closer relations between cultures.

Personally speaking, the  contributions of our Polynesian citizens to New Zealand as a whole are undeniable.  I have many Polynesian friends and acquaintances
who work and study as hard as the next person but this study don't disputes my opinion and instead, points out that Polynesians as isolated group within New Zealand tend to be in larger numbers on the negative side of the statistics than any other ethical group and the reality of this statement is concerning.

 With this discussion at present, we need to know why and what can be done to bring equilibrium to our socio-economic platform.  These questions cannot be avoided any longer.  Nor can the Maori attempts to revive the past by avoiding the responsibilities of the present, The 'single-mum' benefit culture, binge drinking, gang culture, teenager driving licenses and other serious issues that should be taken more seriously than advertisements on television.

 My concern about this study is not the research itself, the data presented or the way the media has portrayed the news surrounding it but the reaction and resistance of the public and certain Polynesian leaders and Members of Parliament to deal with these facts.  The resistance to truth is concerning and maybe the source of many unsolved problems in a society that struggles with the capacity to face social dilemmas in-pure-fact but to choose on being blinded for the sake of a peaceful week.
 

MAY 20   Selected articles
Pijamas for Presidents - Paul Johnson
The silk rope and the golden cage - Curious Expeditions
 

MAY 19   Lexicon pearls
Honorificabilitudinitatibus   The word consists of 27 letters. This word appeared in the script of Shakespeare titled “Love's Labour's Lost”, which means “invincible glorious.”

Antidisestablishmentarianism   The word consists of 28 letters. This word means “opposition to the withdrawal of state support or recognition from an established church, esp. the Anglican Church in 19th-century England” as explained in Dictionary.com. It has been quoted once by the British Prime Minister, William Ewart Gladstone, 1809- 1898.

Floccinaucihihilipilification   The word comprises of 29 letters. It means “act or habit to deny the value of some particular things.”

Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious   The word comprises of 34 letters. This word appeared in a movie called “Mary Poppins”, which means “good.”

Hepaticocholecystostcholecystntenterostomy   The word consists of 42 letters. It appears in the “Medical Dictionary” edited by Gao De as a surgical terminology, which refers to indirect artificial tube surgery between the intestine and gallbladder or in the gallbladder and bile duct.
 

MAY 18   Newman on Victorian Gentleman
John Henry Cardinal Newman, the most famous English convert to Roman Catholicism of the nineteenth century, included the following description of the gentleman in his treatise on university education for Roman Catholics, who had only recently received civil rights. As you read Newman's portrait of the gentleman, compare it to those found in discussions of the concept of gentleman in Elizabeth Gaskell and other authors as well as specific characters in Robert Browning, Charles Dickens, and Anthony Trollope.
 

It is almost a definition of a gentleman to say he is one who never inflicts pain. This description is both refined and, as far as it goes, accurate. He is mainly occupied in merely removing the obstacles which hinder the free and unembarrassed action of those about him; and he concurs with their movements rather than takes the initiative himself. His benefits may be considered as parallel to what are called comforts or conveniences in arrangements of a personal nature:  like an easy chair or a good fire, which do their part in dispelling cold and fatigue, though nature provides both means of rest and animal heat without them.

The true gentleman in like manner carefully avoids whatever may cause a jar or a jolt in the minds of those with whom he is cast; — all clashing of opinion, or collision of feeling, all restraint, or suspicion, or gloom, or resentment; his great concern being to make every one at their ease and at home. He has his eyes on all his company; he is tender towards the bashful, gentle towards the distant, and merciful towards the absurd; he can recollect to whom he is speaking; he guards against unseasonable allusions, or topics which may irritate; he is seldom prominent in conversation, and never wearisome. He makes light of favours while he does them, and seems to be receiving when he is conferring. He never speaks of himself except when compelled, never defends himself by a mere retort, he has no ears for slander or gossip, is scrupulous in imputing motives to those who interfere with him, and interprets every thing for the best. He is never mean or little in his disputes, never takes unfair advantage, never mistakes personalities or sharp sayings for arguments, or insinuates evil which he dare not say out. From a long-sighted prudence, he observes the maxim of the ancient sage, that we should ever conduct ourselves towards our enemy as if he were one day to be our friend. He has too much good sense to be affronted at insults, he is too well employed to remember injuries, and too indolent to bear malice. He is patient, forbearing, and resigned, on philosophical principles; he submits to pain, because it is inevitable, to bereavement, because it is irreparable, and to death, because it is his destiny. If he engages in controversy of any kind, his disciplined intellect preserves him from the blunder. [From The Idea of a University, 1852]

Taken in isolation, Newman's descriptive definition, which appears an exemplary idealization of the British gentleman, appears a standard, unsurprising presentation of a sociopolitical ideal clearly related to specific class interest. In context, however, his statement immediately appears more complex, since he does not address those with political or even economic power. In fact, his intended audience of Irish Catholics were doubly disenfranchised as members of a colonized people and a despised, only recently permitted religion. In addition, as David J. DeLaura points out, for Newman, "the insuperable defect of humanistic culture," appears in the limitations of the gentleman, who has 'no means for transcending the limits of the natural man (p. 238).'"
 

MAY 14   The Hague  by Roberto Correa
 
 
So I wonder, what would it be like to have tea with Queen Beatrix at The Hague's famous Hofvijver House.  Preferably on third floor of the left side, facing towards the waves of the North Sea, crashing far from the window. 

The 18th century French Rococo clock gives me 17:46 and the last rays of the autumn sun reflects on a restored painting of William of Orange holding a book like the Holy Bible.  Nerveless, Her Majesty wears an uncompromising green dress, expensive!  The silverware is in place and she serves me personally. 

The Parliament is empty, except for the tall cheese head security guard reading a third edition of Chekov's Ivanov that he found.  Back to Beatrix, she tells me of the cold weather and small talks about Dutch football, none too interesting to be sincere.  The tea compensates for the morbid sensation in the air, and I imagine how much it would cost the taxpayer to maintain the building. 

Beatrix is still a beautiful woman for her age, privileges of European royalty I guess.  She speaks with a perfect Danelaw English accent, and I am not sure how it came about.  I asked the queen if she thinks of poverty not as physical stance but poverty of mind, which she ponders for a minute or two.  From her response, it becomes clear that the predestined don't suffer judgement and therefore there is no need for philosophical enquiries.
 
- More tea, she asked.
- No thanks, I replied.

She excused herself for a moment, leaving the room exactly when I dropped Danish biscuit crumb on the floor over an expensive blue Velour d'Utrecht Moquette carpet...  Before I can clean the mess, my clock at work goes off, and I find myself back to my office for morning break.

....The carpet was left unclean and the queen never returned at all.  As the day goes by, I am still upset about the Velour d'Utrecht carpet...  I think to myself...  Velour d'Utrecht.
 
 

 


Nothing in art can describe perfection as an etching from Giovani Piranesi.
 

MAY 13   Per diem
Notes of today:
Never annoy your barista!

Some songs should only be only played at sunset.

In search
The Wealth of Nations (book) by Adam Smith.

Questions:
Why Salome killed John the Baptist? √
 What's important to modern man?
 What should a wife of a saint be called?
Where the Moorish went?

Thought
"A man is measured by the number of people in his funeral."
 

MAY 12   Random notes from my Moleskine II
Vermouth
French salon system
Salonières
Récamier
Bloomsbury
Tesseracts
St. Augustine's Confessions
Das Kapital
Wittgenstein's Tractatus
Oxford Street
Speaking with authority
Apotegms
Thematically
Chain reaction
Memento mori
Strange matter

 

MAY 11   I'm a Mason now
Far from literature in excellence, Jonathan Coulton's song made me laugh.  Worth to post.
 
 

You used to laugh at me when I drove a Shriner’s car
You said it’d never fly that I’d never get this far
I always knew that I would make it someday
Now you’d be safer staying out of my way

Cause guess what I’m a Mason now
And you better take care if you want to stay
On the good side of the guy who’s
Got the secret handshake down

You think you’re pretty bad with your pretty trophy wife
You drive a pretty car through your polo trophy life
I got a robe and a pretty nice ring
You bet that brotherhood’s a wonderful thing

Guess what I’m a Mason now
And you better take care if you want to stay
On the good side of the guy who’s
Got the secret handshake down

Should we talk about the governments that I control?
Should we talk about the hands of fate, the dice they roll?
The secret things you’ll never see?
The secret man you’ll never be?
The secret rooms that have no windows?

Too late to make amends cause the wheel’s in motion now
So get up off your knees, try to carry on somehow
You can’t escape it so you better not try
Now there’s some friends of mine who’d like to say hi

Guess what I’m a Mason now
And you better take care if you want to stay
On the good side of the guy who’s
Got the secret handshake down

 
 

MAY 10   Die logik muss für sich selber sorgen
To my opinion, a teachers worth is measured by three main criteria:

I. The teacher's impact on students / undergraduates.
II. The teacher's influence on other teachers.
III. The lasting value of the material taught.
 

MAY 9   Subterranean thoughts III
Brian Despain gallery
In defence of the unthinkable
Safe swimming in Auckland Beache's
Peter Gay's "Modernism"
Benjamin Franklin, Founder and Francophile
Everything you know about absinthe is wrong.
Get Lost Greenpeace!
 

MAY 8   America's favourite books
According to Business Wire Magazine, When it comes to reading, we know what genre Americans are reading, but what is Americans favourite book?

Across all demographic groups the number one book is The Bible. Behind The Bible, the Civil War is still being fought as Margaret Mitchells Gone with the Wind comes in second. Fantasy and a bit of fear round out the top five favourite books of all time: in at number 3 is J.R.R. Tolkiens Lord of the Rings series and number 4 is that other fantasy series, J.K. Rowlings Harry Potter books. In fifth is one of the masters of scary books Stephen King and The Stand

These are the results of a nationwide Harris Poll of 2,513 U.S. adults surveyed online by Harris Interactive between March 11 and 18, 2008.

The next five start off with Dan Browns The Da Vinci Code, followed by To Kill a Mockingbird. Number 7 is another Dan Brown novel, the Robert Langdon prequel Angels and Demons, followed by Ayn Rands Atlas Shrugged at number nine. Finishing off the top ten favourite books is J.D. Salingers Catcher in the Rye.

While The Bible is number one among each of the different demographic groups, there is a large difference in the number two favourite book. For men, that belongs to Lord of the Rings while women cite Gone with the Wind as their number two. There is also a generational divide. For Echo Boomers (those aged 18-31) their second favourite is the Harry Potter series while Generation X (those aged 32-43) is split between The Stand and Angels and Demons. Baby Boomers (those aged 44-62) and Matures (those aged 63 and older) think alike and both cite Gone with the Wind.

While its not surprising that Gone with the Wind is the second favourite book in the South, its also number two in the Midwest. Easterners are more partial to the Lord of the Rings series and Westerners cite The Stand as their second favourite book. Whites and Hispanics also say Gone with the Wind is their second favourite while African Americans say it is Angels and Demons. Educational levels have the largest differences. Those with high school or less education cite Gone with the Wind as their second favourite book of all time while Americans with some college education say it is The Stand. College graduates go to Lord of the Rings and those with a post graduate education are tied as both Lord of the Rings and To Kill a Mockingbird come in number two for them.

Finally, they may not agree on candidates, but one thing that brings together partisans is their favourite book. For Republicans, Democrats and Independents, the top two books are the same The Bible followed by Gone with the Wind.

United States 2008 favourite books
The Bible
Gone with the Wind, by Margaret Mitchell
Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien
Harry Potter by J.K. Rowling
The Stand, by Stephen King
The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown
To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee
Angels and Demons by Dan Brown
Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand
Catcher in the Rye by
J.D. Salinger
 

MAY 6   Random notes from my Moleskine
"This Realm is an empire"
Unimpressive collection of men
Environment affecting individual
Laws of attraction
Social reinforcement
Filtering of genes
tribalistic connection
suitability
Line of influence
Matting
Juggernaut state - Destroying it's own legitimacy by expanding beyond its ordained role.
Parliamentary despotism
Predestination
"The limitation of ideas normally exceed the individual capacity of Beings"
"Quo Vadis?"
 

MAY 4   The state of nation
Fundamental words to describe New Zealand at present.  Let's agree to disagree...
 
 
Socialism's fundamental principles are centred on a critique of this concept, stating, among other things, that the cost of defending property is higher than the returns from private property ownership, and that even when property rights encourage the property-holder to develop his property, generate wealth, etc., he will only do so for his own benefit, which may not coincide with the benefit of other people or society at large. 

Public property is any property that is controlled by a state or by a whole community. Private property is any property that is not public property. Private property may be under the control of a single individual or by a group of individuals collectively.  Some philosophers like Karl Marx use it to describe a social relationship between those who sell their labour power and those who buy it.
   
e.g.   Auckland Airport vs. Canadian pension funds e.g.   Cheung Kong Holdings buying Vector lines.
 
 

MAY 1   The adventures of Lord Timothy Dexter
I would venture to say that few men have ever combined in their life's narrative such wacky individuality and incredible good fortune as ‘Lord’ Timothy Dexter. He was the author of A Pickle for the Knowing Ones, or Plain Truth in a Homespun Dress, a small collection of correspondence and chronicles, first self-published as an anthology in May, 1802. But who was the the so-called 'Newburyport Nut’?

espite his lack of education, Dexter had the Midas touch in business. At the end of the American War of Independence he bought large amounts of European currencies that were worthless at the time. When trade connections resumed, he had amassed a fortune. He built two ships and began an export business to West Indies and to Europe. He shipped warming pans to the former, which is, of course, a tropical region, where they were discovered by his captain to be useful ladles for the local molasses industry. Dexter made a good profit. Asian merchants bought the mittens for export to Siberia.

His next venture was the proverbial ‘selling coals to Newcastle’, which should have signalled certain failure, but Dexter’s ships arrived as the city was crippled by a coalminers’ strike and Dexter gained an enormous profit. He exported bibles to the East Indies and stray cats to Caribbean islands and again somehow turned a profit. He also hoarded whalebone by mistake, but ended up selling it profitably as a support material for corsets.

He married in 1770 a rich widow named Elizabeth (Lord) Frothingham, and bought a big house -Chester State in New Hampshire- in which they settled with her four children (they later had a son and daughter of their own) and set up a glover’s shop. He once gave Elizabeth $2000 to leave him and hired her back for the same sum two weeks later.

He acquired a peerage, which was meant to help him gain access to the society that snubbed him for his eccentricities, but to no avail. He also bought a new house in Newburyport and decorated it with minarets, a golden eagle on the top of the cupola, a mausoleum for himself and a garden of 40 wooden statues of Venus and famous men, including George Washington, William Pitt, Napoleon Bonaparte, Thomas Jefferson, John Hancock, John Adams, King George III, and of course, himself, towering over all.

The inscription on his own effigy read: "I am the first in the East, the first in the West, and the greatest philosopher in the Western World."  He stated, “I will show the world one of the Grete wonders of the world in 15 months … that is, if no man murders me in Dors or out of Dors.”   People flocked to gawk at this collection. His 40-piece’”mouseum’ consisted of groupings with the titles such as, ‘Motherly Love’ and ‘Four Lions Lying Down with a Lamb’. It is said that his mansion was the scene of bacchanalian orgies.

Dexter also had his own way with household staff. He had a black and protective housekeeper called Lucy, whom he claimed to be a daughter of an African prince. Other servants included a large idiot, a fortune teller and his “poet laureate”, Jonathan Plummer.  At the age of 50 Dexter decided to write a book about himself – the aforementioned 24-page pamphlet, entirely devoid of all punctuation: A Pickle for the Knowing Ones or Plain Truth in a Homespun Dress. He wrote about himself and complained about politicians, clergy and his wife.

After the sell-out of the first printing, Lord Dexter, in deference to demanding readers, amended the second edition by adding periods, commas, semicolons and other punctuation. However: rather than disperse punctuation throughout the text, Dexter added a page of ‘stops’ containing nothing but punctuation marks, along with this curt message:

“the nowing ones complane of my book the fust edition had no stops I put in a nuf here and thay may peper and solt it as they please

At first he handed his book out for free, but it rapidly became popular and ran into eight editions in total. It seems that no matter what Dexter did, he made money on it. 

Timothy Dexter life He wasn’t entirely daft, and his remarks could sometimes show great insight, as on one occasion, when the newspapers were reporting Lord Thurlow’s famous remark, “When I forget my king, may my God forget me.” Dexter parodied it to “When I forget myself, may God forget me”.

On July 28, 1803, Dexter published a notice of sale of his estate, mentioning fear of his life. It seems he also began to wonder what people would say about him after he died. He proceeded to announce his death and to prepare for a burial. About 3,000 people appeared for the wake – they went through all the rituals of an actual funeral while he watched from inside the house. However, Dexter’s wife refused to cry for his passing (legend says he beat her for this indiscretion) and so he decided not to appear to his guests at all. He did, however, actually pass on in 1806. Towards the end of his wacky career he appears to have regretted his follies, and was generous with his fortune. Or, so it is said.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
About
Contact
Blog
Articles
Links
Books
Psychology

   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Roberto Correa © 2004 All Rights Reserved - Auckland - New Zealand
This work is under Creative-Common Attribution-Non-commercial 3.0 New Zealand